Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM:

The chief of police in Montgomery County, Md., says his officers are not looking into sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, appearing to contradict a local news report that “investigators” were looking at a potential second high school misconduct allegation.

“I have spoken with my chief of detectives, and neither of us have any knowledge of anyone coming forward to us to report any allegations involving Judge Kavanaugh,” police Chief J. Thomas Manger told the Washington Examiner in an email.

The article goes on to state the following:

The Montgomery County Sentinel reported Monday that “Montgomery County investigators” were “looking at” a “potential second sexual assault complaint” dating from Kavanaugh’s senior year the Georgetown Prep high school “after an anonymous witness came forward this weekend.”

To weigh in on this information provided by WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM, engage in our LIVE CHAT below. Scroll down.


  1. This whole thing has gotten so sick….What is the left trying to do to this man? To have things like this happening in our own government is disgusting. There needs to be an investigation into this “anonymous” source, where it came from, who is doing it, and have them arrested for obstruction of justice. How far are they all willing to go, just because they don’t seem to want to grow up, suck it up, and learn to work together with OUR president!!

  2. Kavenaugh is a decent man with a stellar 35 year career. These allegations, if true, happened during teen years and were never serious enough for that time, to call authorities and investigate.

  3. Is there not a statute of limitations on this type of crime. I would think it was too late to file anything 35 years after this supposed crime. Funny how they can’t find anyone in the recent past laying claims to being assaulted by him in all these years! They’ll pay anything to not have him confirmed. Why an anonymous report?

  4. These women claim what happened was so traumatic, then why can they not remember the date and details IF it really happened?
    You do not forget the details of traumatic events so easily.

Comments are closed.