Hillary: “Unborn Person Doesn’t Have Constitutional Rights”

hillary-clinton-planned-parenthood 4

Planned Parenthood is upset that she used the word “person”. 

It is appalling to Pro-Life advocates that anyone would say an unborn child does not have rights, but Pro-Choice advocates are equally infuriated by Clinton’s comment, as they do not acknowledge personhood.  “The fetus is not a baby,” claims Planned Parenthood.

Clinton has long been a supporter of Planned Parenthood and abortion rights, and Planned Parenthood has endorsed her for President.   

From The Washington Times:  Democratic primary front-runner Hillary Clinton ran afoul of both the pro-life and pro-choice sides of the abortion debate Sunday when she said constitutional rights do not apply to an “unborn person” or “child.”

“The unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights,” Mrs. Clinton said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Now that doesn’t mean that we don’t do everything we possibly can in the vast majority of instances to, you know, help a mother who is carrying a child and wants to make sure that child will be healthy, to have appropriate medical support.”

Mrs. Clinton also said “there is room for reasonable kinds of restrictions” on abortion during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Diana Arellano, manager of community engagement for Planned Parenthood Illinois Action, said Sunday that Mrs. Clinton’s comments undermined the cause for abortion rights.   The comment “further stigmatizes #abortion,” Ms. Arellano said in a tweet. “She calls a fetus an ‘unborn child’ & calls for later term restrictions.”

Describing the fetus as a “person” or “child” has long been anathema to the pro-choice movement, which argues the terms misleadingly imply a sense of humanity.   In addition, the specific term “person” is a legal concept that includes rights and statuses that the law protects, including protection of a person’s life under the laws against homicide. Pro-choice intellectuals have long said that even if an unborn child is a “life,” it is not yet a “person.”

[pullquote align=”full” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””] Guidelines issued by the International Planned Parenthood Federation discourage pro-choice advocates from using terms such as “abort a child,” instead recommending “more accurate/appropriate” alternatives such as “end a pregnancy” or “have an abortion.”


“‘Abort a child’ is medically inaccurate, as the fetus is not yet a child,” the guide reads. “‘Terminate’ a pregnancy is commonly used, however some people prefer to avoid this as terminate may have negative connotations (e.g., ‘terminator or assassinate’) for some people.”


The guidebook also advises against the terms “baby,” “dead fetus,” “unborn baby” or “unborn child” when discussing what it is that’s being aborted. Instead, it recommends the terms “embryo,” “fetus” and “the pregnancy.”


“The alternatives are medically accurate terms, as the embryo or fetus is not a baby,” it explains. [/pullquote]

(Read more at Washington Times)


Comment via Facebook


Comment via Disqus

What You Need To Know About Clinton, Illegals and Obamacare
Important Facts You Need To Know About Voter Fraud
Why You Need To Know the FACTS Before The Debate!
Thanks for sharing!
Register to win! Free DML DVDs and shirts. Plus free iPads, gifts, and more. Enter your email to be eligible. A new winner is picked each week.

Send this to friend