Sign up for our newsletter

Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by LAWANDCRIME.COM:

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) wants voters to know that they are dead-set and serious about their strongly-worded opposition to controversial Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

To that end, the constitutionally–though not always politically–liberal organization is running a series of ads in four states aimed at center-right senators seen to be wavering in their support for the would-be associate Supreme Court justice.

The article goes on to state the following:

The all-but-sure-to-be-inflammatory advertisement compares Kavanaugh to Bill Cosby and Bill Clinton. Cosby was recently sentenced to a three-10 year prison term for sexual assaulting Andrea Constand after being found guilty earlier this year. In sum, more than 50 women accused Cosby of drugging, assaulting, sexually harassing or raping them over the course of multiple decades.

The video can be seen below.

NEW: When we said we’re going to use the full force of the ACLU to stop Brett Kavanaugh, we meant it.

We’re spending more than $1 million to run ads like this in Nebraska, Colorado, West Virginia, and Alaska 👇

— ACLU (@ACLU) October 1, 2018

To weigh in on this information provided by LAWANDCRIME.COM, engage in our LIVE CHAT below. Scroll down.

Sign up for our newsletter

Click here to join the comments

Previous articleTrump Tweet: Thank you TN
Next articleREPORT: Mark Judge’s lawyer says he was interviewed by the FBI


  1. They really have to change liable laws in this country. How can our justice system allow people to slander a man with no evidence and he not be able to seek recourse??????

Comments are closed.