As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by WSJ.com:
A federal appeals court in California on Wednesday ruled that privately operated internet platforms are free to censor content they don’t like.
Though not unexpected, the unanimous decision by the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco marks the most emphatic rejection of the argument advanced in some conservative circles that YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and other giant tech platforms are bound by the First Amendment.
The article goes on to state the following:
The case concerned a YouTube channel operated by Prager University, a nonprofit founded by talk-radio host Dennis Prager that produces short explainer videos promoting conservative ideas. In 2017, PragerU sued YouTube and its parent, Alphabet Inc.’s Google, after YouTube flagged dozens of its videos as “inappropriate,” stripping the clips of advertising and making them less accessible to students, library users and children.
CLICK HERE to read more from the Wall Street Journal.
Privately operated internet platforms, such as YouTube, are free to censor content they don’t like, a federal appeals court in California on Wednesday ruled https://t.co/YRuZcuKBNU
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) February 26, 2020
The court decision marks the most emphatic rejection of the argument that YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and other giant tech platforms are bound by the First Amendment and aren’t allowed to censor contenthttps://t.co/mkOewxyPIh
— Hamza Shaban (@hshaban) February 27, 2020
— The Hill (@thehill) February 27, 2020
To get more information about this article, please visit WSJ.com.