As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by LA Times:
Last month, California became the first state to kick out privately run immigrant detention centers. A new law that also bans private prisons prohibits new contracts or changes to existing ones after Jan. 1 and phases out existing detention facilities entirely by 2028.
But on Oct. 16, five days after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 32 into law, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials posted a solicitation — a request for offers — on the Federal Business Opportunities website for at least four detention facilities around the state.
Democratic state legislators and advocates for immigrants say that ICE’s action is a blatant attempt to circumvent the law in order to continue detaining immigrants in California. They’re now calling for answers from the agency, which has remained tight-lipped about the situation.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Cali.), who is running to capture the Democratic nomination for president in 2020, weighed in, according to the LA Times.
“Let’s be clear: By rushing through new contracts before California’s ban takes effect, ICE is violating the spirit of California law and risks wasting taxpayer dollars in an attempt to lock away even more human beings,” Harris reportedly said. “We need to fight back.”
— Montrealtimes (@mtltimesnews) November 9, 2019
Five says after Gov. Newsom signed a law banning private immigrant detention centers in California, ICE officials posted an online solicitation for at least four detention facilities around the statehttps://t.co/JJwSFQgnun
— KTLA (@KTLA) November 9, 2019
ICE is rushing to build private detention centers in California before they are banned on Jan. 1st.
Californians passed a bill banning for-profit prisons because no one should profit off the detention of immigrants.https://t.co/SSjiDojWfS
— ACLU of Northern CA (@ACLU_NorCal) November 4, 2019
To get more information about this article, please visit LA Times. To weigh in, leave a comment below.