Sign up for our newsletter

Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News offers the following information published by TheHill.com:

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal from a lower court ruling that allows a customer to sue the manufacture of flushable wipes over false advertising.

The case stems from a class-action lawsuit brought by Jennifer Davidson after she purchased Scott Naturals Flushable Moist Wipes in 2013 and noticed they “felt sturdy and thick” and “did not break up in the toilet like toilet paper,” according to court documents.

The article goes on to state the following:

Though the wipes did not clog Davidson’s home plumbing, she argued the manufacturer’s use of the term “flushable” in its marketing was deceptive and claimed the company had violated California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act, its False Advertising Law and the Unfair Competition Law.

Show your support for President Trump!

To get more information about this article, please visit TheHill.com. To weigh in, leave a comment below.

Sign up for our newsletter

Click here to join the comments

Previous articleREPORT: Twitter Tells Canadian Editor He’s Violating Pakistan’s Blasphemy Law
Next articleVIDEO: False statement charges abound in Mueller probe, in contrast to Hillary Clinton case