Sign up for DML's newsletter

The Dennis Michael Lynch podcast for today, Sept. 30, is 49 minutes, and it is a must-hear!

DML interviews a virologist with 40 years experience, Dr. Steven Hatfill. He’s been through everything you can imagine. His comments are heart/stopping!

LISTEN BELOW:

Sign up for DML's newsletter
Previous articleREPORT: Tommy Kirk, ‘Old Yeller’ child star, dead at 79
Next articleDML Morning Briefing: Thurs. Sept. 30

66 COMMENTS

  1. Great podcast! Amazing how we the people are being controlled by this government and that includes both administrations! I will have to go back to find his site to see more of his posts! Thank you DML!

  2. I’ve never caught covid or got shot yet. My husband got covid 2 weeks ago for first time and he just had sinus problem and body was hurting some. He never got shot. I slept with my husband when he had covid but I never caught it somehow. I’m wondering if he actually had covid but according to a home test and lab test he had it.

    • So, here’s the problem with personal reports like this. Did you, his wife, get tested for the virus and it was negative? Infected people may not have any symptoms.

    • If the PRC test was used and if they cycled it (CT cycle threshold) anything past 20 often 45 then the false positives go up tp 90% as you CT it to 45. The inventor of the CRP test said as you cycle the test up to 45 ( which the CDC recommends) the test can show anything you want!

  3. Deep State (Satan) is working hard for time is running out for them but sadly it is prophesied in the Bible. Get saved by the blood of Jesus Christ for this is just the beginning of tribulation.

  4. No what’s truly amazing is the number of trolls that rolled up their sleeves and took the poison jab with absolutely NO questions asked. Nothing more than big g lemmings that loved being controlled

    • My 94 year old mom and my 72 year old husband wanted the vaccine. We were in FL. I felt like I was in an Orwellian movie —- cars by the hundreds lined up at the fair grounds and people just putting their arms out for the jab — no questions asked / no information given. I will never get over that feeling.

  5. Great interview. Nothing new that I haven’t heard before but the more people that say it maybe more people will wake up and see the truth! #stopthemadness

  6. DML, you should interview many of the health care professionals fired for refusing to take the vaccine. Find out why, what do they know? Are they aware of the usefulness of HCQ, IVM, etc and the unprecedented pressure to stop their use?

  7. I’ve been taking Hydroxychloroquine for about 4 years. No problems, and it was quite inexpensive. President Trump brought it up, and said he was taking it, and all of a sudden I could only get 2 weeks worth of my medication at a time. I was able to get 3 months at a time before.
    As I said earlier, it was a very inexpensive drug. I don’t recall how much it was prior, but it is now $265 for a month. I feel comfortable not getting the vax. I own my business. I’m not going to fire me. (We also won’t be having random drug testing.)
    I live in the Florida panhandle, and my governor is a rock star.

    • Wait til Leviathan includes employers with fewer than 100 employees. For authoritarians, it’s always a step by step process until they achieve control or their victims revolt.

    • I’ve been on HCQ for about 5-6 years. I still get 3 month supply and I’ve had no supply interruptions and cost is still the same $22 for 3 months at Walmart.

  8. Confirmed everything I thought!! Great podcast!! Sharing to my friends and family!! Also, with money being one of the reasons for the push on vaccine- the other reason that you guys struggled with an answer- in my opinion it’s population control!!! If they really truly cared about people and their lives they would pass out pass out hydroxychloroquin like candy and educate properly. Not with lies. It’s about Power, money, control! Like the good brave doctor said- 700,000 lives lost innocently! That’s enough that should make the people boiling mad and stand up to fight against these politicians and measures!

    • I highly recommend to anyone—someone that really cares for the TRUTH to look into what the 700,000 people ACTUALLY DIED OF—NOT DIED WITH—DIED FROM!!!!! +- a year ago the CDC put out an an announcement—I only seen it once and it disappeared—they announce 97% of those announced dying of Covid 19 were killed of something other than the virus like obesity, diabetes, etc, etc, etc—–Covid 19 was present but not the cause of death!!! You will find too things like auto accidents, suicides, long drops off tall buildings—-as long as they had the virus—-the virus is what they died from!!! Look it up, I did, only once, then I stopped looking!!! Seems the BS is more important than the truth to the powers-that-be!!!!!

  9. Excellent Podcast. Exposing the corruption in FDA,and govt. in general is what needs to happen. The undue pressure to get this experimental vaccine is communistic. Most people do not take the time to do research to become informed…. But we have never been faced with a situation like this before. I’ve shared the Poscast with everyone I know. Thank you for what you do.

  10. Wish “doctors” could be Independent again; not part of “health systems”! I had both & miss those earlier times. Need $$ now to go into “concierge” med

  11. DML, Love the Podcast. Thank you. DML, you know the gov. Is keeping this going. They don’t want it to go away. KEEP US down and controlled. I believe it is here to stay. Plus money….. Someone’s getting rich….Called Plandemic…….

  12. So, I listened to the podcast and then went online to view the Brit complaint. I still don’t understand: (1) who is really responsible for the vax; and (2) why President Trump was touting it when he must have known that it did not pass clinical trials. I am a firm supporter of President Trump, but these questions still go unanswered to me.

    • I wondered about this too. Then I read about the Swine Flu vaccine. After it was approved they changed it. There were deaths, so they discontinued it. But not anywhere near the number that are out there from covid vaccines.

  13. Great Listen DML! I shared the hell out of it, finally feel like questions were answered. Big Pharma and China win and because we have a bought and payed for President we suffer. We got to find a way out of this nightmare. Thank you for being a loud voice. Safe travels out there.

  14. This is Explosive! The Drug Companies are the root cause of this total F*ck Up. And The Biden administration is Clueless! Share this podcast far and wide

  15. A real.mindblower ! I want to thsnk you for this tremendous podcast , each day you are bringing the UN sugar coated FACTS on our current state of affairs . This Dr spoke from decades of experience and knowledge GREAT job !!

  16. Great Podcast DML. I’m 67 and I did get the J&J last April (thought if I got it I wouldn’t have to wear a mask). I live in NC so that didn’t last long we are back to indoor masks. I’m not getting the booster.

  17. If the company you work for can control your medical they will eventually control your life. That’s the plan. Control and social scoring. That’s what China does. Gavin Newsome had a million $ mask deal with China in 2020. Gotta sell those masks. Check your tag, made in China.

  18. Look into Cerberus Corporation
    They own 32,000 grocery stores in USA they also own Dominion Voting machines. I worked for a grocery store for 30 yrs. unions have changed in fact I believe they are infiltrated by CCP. They were the first stores to push for mask mandates. They won…

    • There’s a bow tie connection between all these major corporations and they are in cohoots together. They are all owned by one or two elites. Let’s start figuring this out. Nothing is a coincidence.

  19. LOVE THIS PODCAST—-I am 71. I refuse to get the jab. For me there is just not enough as far as long term testing. I tested positive for COVID Aug 9th – I asked my doctor for Ivermectin that first day. He refused saying he felt enough studies were not done on it. I contacted the front line doctors and was able to get a prescription. The pharmacist at CVS would NOT fill it – he told me it was a lethal dose so he wouldn’t do it. The front line doctor found a pharmacist who would fill it. I recovered in 2 weeks. I would love to stand in front of that pharmacist and yell “Lethal dose my
    a—!” Lethal could have been to do nothing. I was just in awe that NO ONE locally would help. It was go home and stay there, if you can’t breathe then go to the hospital—- no wonder the hospitals were filling up again. I am living proof that early treatment is the key…..By the way, my husband IS vaccinated and he tested positive 10 days after I did. He did not take Ivermectin and his symptoms went on a week longer than mine.
    Thank you DML for all you do.

  20. All excellent information. It should be noted that Zinc should be taken with Hydroxychloroquine since Hydroxychloroquine facilitates entry of Zinc into the cell which then interferes or blocks replication of the COVID-19 virus. That is why it is important to take this drug early in the course of the illness.

  21. This was an excellent podcast ! I found out things that I thought was true . but doctors not filling medication that can help people stay alive really made me wonder ? I guess money and big pharmacy’s are controlling the world now and that’s really scary !!

  22. Great podcast DML!! Our daughter (47) was hospitalized with Covid in December 2020 who was having a hard time breathing! Thanks be to God she had a doctor from India who believed in ivermectin! He gave her three doses and she was out in 8 days vs the normal 15 days! I’m 67 and my husband is 71 and we both have been taking the ivermectin paste since December 2020! We feel great!

  23. This is biowarfare. The first stage, it’s not the virus’s that’s going to get us. It’s the vaccine with the combination of the next virus they let loose on us. The Global Cabal wants us mentally and physically weak when they launch the Great Reset and Marxist New World Order. Our government is just a puppet to the Cabal.

  24. Another terrific interview Dennis. Dr. Steven Hatfill shared excellent information. However, I must correct two things he said.

    1) Dennis was correct when he said the vaccines are useless because their absolute risk reduction (ARR), measure for ALL the Covid19 vaccines is <2%. The ARR is vaccine 'effectiveness,' how much does the vaccine reduce the risk of infection. Pfizer, Moderna and the FDA did not disclose the ARR to the public, ignoring the FDA's own reporting guidelines. Vaccine 'efficacy' is the 'relative' risk reduction (RRR) measure, which is the % decline in the risk of infection between the placebo and vaccinated group. Pfizer's clinical trial data reported the risk of infection of the placebo group was .761% and for the vaccinated group it was .044% (pg. 63, Table 14). So the vaccine 'efficacy' of Pfizer's shot is ~ 95%, which is the % decline from .761% to .044%. But the risk of infection for BOTH the placebo (unvaccinated) group and the vaccinated group was <1%! So a 95% reduction sounds great, but it's a decline from .761% to .044%. This is why the ARR is the valuable statistic and the public needs to know. Pfizer's ARR, vaccine effectiveness, is only .7% (.761% – .044% = .7%). A paper published in The Lancet "Covid-19 vaccine efficacy and effectiveness – the elephant (not) in the room" confirmed ALL the Covid19 shots have an ARR of <2%.

    Dr. Ronald Brown's peer reviewed article in the Medicina Journal reported the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines' ARR, how much they reduce the risk of infection, is only .7% and 1.1% according to their clinical trial data they submitted to the FDA for EUA approval.

    In Dr. Brown's TrialSiteNews interview, he explains the ARR vs. RRR and says most of the public and healthcare providers do not understand the difference between these two statistical measures.

    The FDA’s guidelines for communicating evidence-based risks and benefits to the public states:
    “Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach; this can result in suboptimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk format should be used.” (page 60).

    2) The clinical trial endpoints were never to prevent serious illness and hospitalization. Dr. William Haseltine said in a Sept. 23, 2020 Forbes article titled "Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed," said "We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols—Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca—do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache."

    Peter Doshi, Assoc. Editor of BMJ also wrote the same about clinical trial endpoints. "Hospital admissions and deaths from covid-19 are simply too uncommon in the population being studied for an effective vaccine to demonstrate statistically significant differences in a trial of 30 000 people. The same is true of its ability to save lives or prevent transmission: the trials are not designed to find out."

    An NIAID funded study published Oct. 28, 2020 on Informed Consent said vaccine clinical trial participants were not properly informed of the antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) risk, which is "non-theoretical and compelling" where the vaccinated could experience "severe disease, lasting morbidity or even death" but would otherwise have a mild case if unvaccinated. This is why a SARS CoV vaccine has never been brought to market because in animal trials, vaccinated mice and ferrets, when later exposed to the SARS virus, developed acute liver failure and lung inflammation, respectively, due to the ADE risk, and either died or had to be euthanized. Covid19 Animal trials were skipped.

    So here we are, mass vaccinating billions of people around the world, costing over a trillion $, when the vaccines not only don't reduce the risk of infection, but they carry ADE risk.

      • Ray, the Reuter’s headline and article reveal they don’t know what they’re talking about. The relative risk reduction measure is vaccine efficacy. No one disputes that. The absolute risk reduction measure is vaccine EFFECTIVENESS. They are two distinctly different statistical measures. As I noted above, the FDA’s guidelines for communicating evidence-based risks and benefits to the public states: “Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach; this can result in suboptimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk format should be used.” (page 60). I tried to post the link to the FDA’s guidelines on their website but the post won’t go through. So here is the link with spaces in it and you can type it in your browser. https:// www. fda. gov/media/81597/download

        Read through the FDA document where it mentions the ARR and why it’s so important. Check the footnotes where they reference studies that provide further explanation for why the ARR is critical to provide patients with the information they need to make informed decisions.

        Here’s another article about the ARR and RRR which explains why the ARR is important.
        “Absolute risk vs relative risk: Each may be accurate. But one may be terribly misleading.”
        https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/tips-for-understanding-studies/absolute-vs-relative-risk/

      • Ray, the Reuter’s headline and article reveal they don’t know what they’re talking about. The relative risk reduction measure is vaccine efficacy. No one disputes that. The absolute risk reduction measure is vaccine EFFECTIVENESS. They are two distinctly different statistical measures.

        As I noted above, the FDA’s guidelines for communicating evidence-based risks and benefits to the public states: “Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach; this can result in suboptimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk format should be used.” (page 60). I tried to post the link to the FDA’s guidelines on their website but the post won’t go through. So search for “FDA guidelines for communicating evidence-based risks and benefits.”

        Read through the FDA document where it mentions the ARR and why it’s so important. Check the footnotes where they reference studies that provide further explanation for why the ARR is critical to provide patients with the information they need to make informed decisions.

        Here’s another article about the ARR and RRR which explains why the ARR is important.
        “Absolute risk vs relative risk: Each may be accurate. But one may be terribly misleading.”
        https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/tips-for-understanding-studies/absolute-vs-relative-risk/

      • Ray, the Reuter’s headline and article reveal they don’t know what they’re talking about. The relative risk reduction measure is vaccine efficacy. No one disputes that. The absolute risk reduction measure is vaccine EFFECTIVENESS. They are two distinctly different statistical measures.

        As I noted above, the FDA’s guidelines for communicating evidence-based risks and benefits to the public states: “Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach; this can result in suboptimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk format should be used.” (page 60). I tried to post the link to the FDA’s guidelines on their website but the post won’t go through. So search for “FDA guidelines for communicating evidence-based risks and benefits.”

        Read through the FDA document where it mentions the ARR and why it’s so important. Check the footnotes where they reference studies that provide further explanation for why the ARR is critical to provide patients with the information they need to make informed decisions.

        Here’s another article about the ARR and RRR which explains why the ARR is important.
        “Absolute risk vs relative risk: Each may be accurate. But one may be terribly misleading.”

        I’m inserting spaces in the link because I’ve tried to post this 3x and it’s not going through.
        https:// www. healthnewsreview. org/toolkit/tips-for-understanding-studies/absolute-vs-relative-risk/

    • Reuter’s headline and article reveals they don’t even understand what they’re writing about. Relative Risk Reduction is vaccine efficacy; no one disputes that. Absolute risk reduction is vaccine effectiveness. They are distinctly different statistical measures.

      As I noted above, the FDA’s “guidelines for communicating evidence-based risks and benefits” to the public states: “Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach; this can result in suboptimal decisions. Thus, an absolute risk format should be used.” (page 60).

      Read through the FDA guidelines where they mention the ARR and why it is important and read the studies they footnote. I will share another article that provides more information since I think there is a one link limit in a comment.

      https://www.fda.gov/media/81597/download

  25. This Podcast was so EXCELLENT DML!
    Wow…powerful information…I’m so glad I listened…now, if the rest of the “brainwashed” world could only hear it and have it sink in…

  26. Thank you for those detailed facts Faith. Bottom line, NO one has been given ANY proper Informed Consent of any sort much less the type you are citing. I enjoyed this podcast but mostly nothing new as I have listened to many doctors and scientists for over a year talking about these things. However one more doctor coming out with the same sorts of statements is a good thing. One thing I wasn’t aware of is how safe HCQ is.
    If you go to the website of children’s health defense (CHD) founded by RFK Jr. they have articles & podcasts daily following everything about this topic, and RFK Jr’s book will come out in Nov that is a deep investigation of Fauci and his sordid history of conflict of interest. Dr Mercola has also been a good guy to follow and he recently published his book “The Truth About Covid 19”, exposing the political aspects. Really there’s tons of truth bombs out there if you know where to look. Try Bitchute and the others. Dr Mercolas articles are always published at Lew Rockwell dot com along with other good authors like Paul Craig Roberts, Jon Rappoport, Bill Sardi and many more. I appreciate you Dennis for this interview, it’s all good but we need to keep educating ourselves and sharing what we learn to counteract the censorship that has become so deep & widespread now. When all the social media giants are involved, that tells you there’s a big agenda afoot and big pharma, and China are not the only players.
    Look at the website of the U.N.s World Economic Forum (WEF) and there you will start to see the depth of the plans they have for the worlds peoples. It’s pretty stomach turning! And yes, the demise of the U.S. as we know it is part of the plan nearly all our politicians are bought into. It’s no secret – “Build back better” is part of the Great Reset outlined by the WEF, and the economic destruction of western countries which they have mostly gone along with has all been planned. Then, too you can take a look at Bill Gates, his foundation, Event 201 and similar events that were simulations played out just before they took us into the plandemic and learn a lot there. We need more ppl to wake up to the bigger picture!! Please!

    • You’re welcome Cs and I tried to include links to all my comments but it wouldn’t allow my comment to post. So I had to remove them and then it worked. I think they allow links, but only one per comment. We are on the same page. I have been receiving Dr. Mercola’s newsletter for over a decade. He does extensive research and every article is well documented/sourced. Unfortunately, he and others have been heavily censored and smeared. We know why.

      I’ve been researching Gates for over a decade. He professes to care about the environment but in his Feb. 10, 2010 Ted Talk, Innovating to Zero, where he talks about reducing carbon emissions to zero, he says “if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that [global population] by perhaps 10 to 15%.” ((time Mark: 4:44). You can find it on YouTube. However, an LA Times article reports he invests in major oil companies that pollute areas in Africa more than what would be allowed in the U.S. or Europe. He also invests in big ag that also pollutes and poisons our land and water.

      We read the same sources (CHD, Lew Rockwell, etc.). If you haven’t watched attorney Reiner Fuellmich’s videos and interviews, look him up on Bitchute, Rumble, etc.

      Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as well as Ivermectin (IVM) are both on the WHO’s List of Essential Medicines and are safe and effective treatments for COVID, backed by numerous studies. As Hatfill noted, HCQ is safe for children and pregnant women. Many pregnant women have safely taken it for COVID19.

      This is a great video about IVM and the corruption surrounding its coverup.
      https://rumble.com/vlpecw-the-story-of-ivermectin.html?fbclid=IwAR3oo062DYFp

    • You’re welcome Cs. We’re on the same page and I follow the same sources. I’ve researched Gates for over a decade. He professes to care about the environment but an LA Times article “Dark cloud over good works of Gates Foundation” reported he invests in big oil companies that pollute far more in Africa than what would be allowed in the U.S. or Europe, creating disease and other health problems. He also invests in big ag that pollutes our land and water. Yet in his “Innovating to Zero” TedTalk, he talks about his concern about carbon emissions and climate change and mentions that in order to reduce carbon emissions to zero by 2050, we have to reduce the global population by 10-15%. His “Innovating to Zero” TedTalk is on YouTube and his comment is time mark 4:14.

      In a Jan. 23, 2019 CNBC interview, Gates said his ‘best investment’ turned $10 billion into $200 billion by investing in global health organizations aimed at increasing access to vaccines, creating a 20-to-1 return. On Dec. 19, 2019, Bill Gates tweeted “What’s next for our foundation? I’m particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of the best buys in global health: vaccines.”

  27. What this doctor is saying many good, real doctors and researchers are saying and have been saying for months and are being censored and destroyed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here