Sign up for our newsletter

Below is a report that DML News gives a 4 OUT OF 4 STARS trustworthiness rating. We base this rating on the following criteria:

  • Provides named sources
  • Reported by more than one notable outlet
  • Does not insert opinion or leading words
  • Includes supporting video, direct statements, or photos

Click here to read more about our rating system.

A drama sparked on Sunday by a report on former National Security Adviser John Bolton drew fire from top Republicans.

“A report in The New York Times revealed a bombshell excerpt from Bolton’s forthcoming book that could prove pivotal in President Trump’s impeachment trial — just as the Amazon product page for the book went live,” Fox 10 Phoenix reported.

“The drama began earlier Sunday when the Times exclusively reported that Bolton’s manuscript included a claim that Trump explicitly linked a hold on Ukraine aid to an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden. Trump told Bolton in August, according to a transcript of Bolton’s forthcoming book reviewed by the Times, ‘that he wanted to continue freezing $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine until officials there helped with investigations into Democrats including the Bidens,'” Fox 10 continued. “The Times further claimed Bolton had shared a manuscript of his forthcoming book with ‘close associates’ — prompting Bolton’s team to deny the claim, and assert that the National Security Council’s [NSC’s] review process of pending manuscripts is ‘corrupted’ and prone to leaks.

Trump Sunday refuted Bolton’s claims, saying he “NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens.”

Trump accused Bolton of trying to “sell a book” and alleged that Bolton never complained publicly or privately about the aid holdup “at the time of his very public termination.”

The media wanted to know if these new developments changed the minds of Republicans over demands to hear Bolton testify.

“I would just say someone telling the New York Times what John Bolton’s draft manuscript supposedly says doesn’t change the underlying facts — doesn’t change those four key facts we’ve been talking about all along,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said. “Just because they bring it up at the last minute… they tried the same darn thing in the House, remember?
“Ambassador Taylor had talked to David Holmes about his conversation that he overheard between Mr. Sondlad and the
president of the United States… But ambassador Taylor was their star witness — he never brought it up. But suddenly David Holmes is bought in the last week with, ‘Oh, I overheard this conversation at a restaurant in Kiev,’ and suddenly that’s supposed to be…┬áThat doesn’t change the underlying facts.
“Just like someone telling the New York Times that they think the draft manuscript of John Bolton’s book says something… That doesn’t change anything so let’s get on with this. The American people want us to get on with this and get it over with so we can get back to the work for them.”

WATCH:

Sign up for our newsletter
Previous articleREPORT: ‘Oh my God, Sanders can win’: Dems grapple with Bernie surge
Next articleREPORT: ‘Draconian measures’ needed to stop coronavirus: Hong Kong doctors beg their leader to close Chinese border