Sign up for our newsletter

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following Op-Ed written by Becket Adams and published by WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM:

If you judge by National Public Radio, a candidate’s political affiliation determines whether it is dangerous to our democracy for said candidate to dispute the results of a U.S. election.

That is the chief takeaway this week from the publicly funded newsgroup, which rediscovered just in time for the 2019 Kentucky gubernatorial race that it is problematic for losing candidates to allege, without evidence, that the election results are untrustworthy.

In a tweet, the NPR declared: “Without providing evidence [Republican] Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin questioned the election’s legitimacy. And he isn’t the first politician to do so. Elections specialists worry that unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud erode confidence in democracy.”

The article goes on to state the following:

The accompanying article, titled “Skeptics Urge Bevin To Show Proof Of Fraud Claims, Warning Of Corrosive Effects,” makes sure to mention the time when President Trump alleged that “millions and millions of people” voted illegally in the 2016 election.

In the report, NPR says there has seldom been any evidence of widespread fraud in elections,” yet “Americans’ confidence in elections has been slowly eroding over the past 20 years.”

According to NPR, “democracy-watchers put some of the blame on political rhetoric.”

In the Op-Ed, Adams points out: “Amazingly, the names ‘Hillary Clinton’ and ‘Stacey Abrams’ are nowhere to be found.”

Clinton and Abrams both vigorously questioned the results of their races.

Read more of this OpEd here: WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM

To get more information about this article, please visit WASHINGTONEXAMINER.COM.

Sign up for our newsletter
Previous articleEXCLUSIVE: Sen. Chuck Schumer gets POUNDED by leftist media over statement on Peter King
Next articleW & T: Veterans Day Message