Sign up for DML's newsletter

As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by Breitbart:

A judge in the Canadian province of Quebec has suspended a father’s right to see his 12-year-old child because the father has not been fully vaccinated against the Wuhan coronavirus.

Superior Court Judge Jean-Sébastien Vaillancourt temporarily denied the father’s access rights to his child in a judgement dated on December 23rd and reported this week, arguing that it was not in the child’s best interest to have contact with this father due to the man’s vaccination status.

The article goes on to state the following:

“It would normally have been in the best interests of the child to have contact with his father, but not in his best interest to have contact with him if he is not vaccinated and is opposed to sanitary measures in the current epidemiological context,” Judge Vaillancourt stated, newspaper Le Devoir reports.


The report explains that the mother of the child, who has full custody rights, had previously agreed for the father to have the child every other weekend and for a week during the holiday season.

However, when the father requested an extra day of access during the holidays, the mother called him a conspiracy theorist and complained that he was not vaccinated.

Although the 12-year-old child is fully vaccinated, the judge declared it was still not safe for the child to be around the unvaccinated father, arguing the vaccine is not enough protection from the Omicron variant, which is currently spreading in Quebec and is highly contagious.

The judge agreed to revisit the case in February, if the father has gotten vaccinated by then or if the pandemic situation has changed.

To get more information about this article, please visit Breitbart.

Listen to the latest daily DML podcasts below! Then please share. And if you have the DML NEWS APP, please tell people to download it today and help conservatives have a real voice.

Sign up for DML's newsletter
Previous articlePOLL: Should the 2024 GOP nominee boycott the presidential debates?
Next articleNEWS ALERT: Trump responds to Supreme Court decision on vax mandates

19 COMMENTS

  1. This whole ‘vaccine’ business and the slavish attitude that everyone has to poison themselves with it, are just a sign of our whole civilization destroying itself. For nothing.

    • Some of the Ronald McDonald Houses in Canada are kicking out sick kids and their families over this vax bs. Really? If you eat their stuff, just stop.

  2. Canada has become evil. I know of people that are planning to leave there to come to the states to live FREELY !!! They want to know which states are the ones and are researching that ! They said it has become horrible to live there ! Cathy

  3. Pure vindictive behavior towards the father nothing more CANNOT comprehend that child being fully ” jabbed” talk about NEGLIGENCE screw that judge what will that dim wit judge do when the virus STILL infects the ” jabbed ones” and they spread it to each other anyway ?? Sickening

  4. I hope the son knows it was his own mother who started this ball rolling.

    She and her husband got a divorce, but the father and son did not. This mother is a rotten tomato.

    I agree the judge is just too woke to remain on the bench. This judgment was a disgrace to justice.

  5. This judge is a real pea brain. The kid is vaccinated, the father is the one at risk. It’s OK to get the virus from a vaccinated person but not unvaxxed. The vaccine doesn’t protect from omnicronwhich is the subject of concern to this pinhead judge. Wait until the long term side affects come out and the vaxxed realize there is no recourse. All entities have immunity from civil action. It the only aspect of the vaccine that works.

  6. Mom is using the vaccine crap as leverage against the father. Father needs to sue her and the judge and bring the studies with him

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here