As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by DAILYCALLER.COM:
The New York Times quietly removed its assertion that the New York Post’s reporting on Hunter Biden’s laptop prior to the 2020 election was “unsubstantiated” from a story published Monday about a Federal Election Commission complaint related to the matter.
The Times reported Monday that the FEC ruled in August that Twitter did not violate any laws by temporarily blocking users from sharing the Post’s Oct. 14 story on a “smoking gun” email from Hunter Biden’s laptop showing that an executive of a Ukrainian gas company had thanked him for an introduction to then-Vice President Joe Biden. The Times called the story “unsubstantiated” when its article on the FEC’s decision was first published early Monday afternoon.
The article goes on to state the following:
“The Federal Election Commission has dismissed Republican accusations that Twitter violated election laws in October by blocking people from posting links to an unsubstantiated New York Post article about Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s son Hunter Biden, in a decision that is likely to set a precedent for future cases involving social media sites and federal campaigns,” Times reporter Shane Goldmacher stated in its original version of his report Monday.
The Daily Caller noted that back on October 29, a cybersecurity expert had stated that the email at the center of the Post’s story was unquestionably authentic.
Although the New York Times has updated their report to remove the word “unsubstantiated,” their original tweet also contained the word, and has not been taken down.
Breaking News: The FEC ruled that Twitter’s decision in October to block an unsubstantiated article about President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, did not violate election laws, according to a document obtained by The New York Times. https://t.co/EzFKKvQ7X2
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 13, 2021
Washington Examiner editor Daniel Chaitin first noted that the Time had quietly revised their article, and tagged Twitter, writing, “Your trending section hasn’t gotten the memo.”
— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) September 14, 2021
Daily Caller editor Geoffrey Ingersoll tweeted, “The “unsubstantiated” Hunter Biden story is true and has since been substantiated. Pretty amazing that nowhere does this NYT article make those facts clear. It just lets the audience believe, misleadingly, that the story was either bogus or a Russian op.”
The “unsubstantiated” Hunter Biden story is true and has since been substantiated.
Pretty amazing that nowhere does this NYT article make those facts clear. It just lets the audience believe, misleadingly, that the story was either bogus or a Russian op https://t.co/uku43cFnqL
— Geoffrey Ingersoll (@GPIngersoll) September 13, 2021
Free Beacon reporter Chuck Ross tweeted, “A source familiar with this ruling tells me that the FEC does not call the Biden laptop article “unsubstantiated.” That’s NYT’s language.”
A source familiar with this ruling tells me that the FEC does not call the Biden laptop article “unsubstantiated.” That’s NYT’s language https://t.co/OFoNJths71
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) September 13, 2021
Fox News contributor Sara Carter mocked, “Unsubstantiated? LOL…NYT desperate to continue to cover for Biden and sons.”
Unsubstantiated? LOL…NYT desperate to continue to cover for Biden and sons … https://t.co/0NrVwPbC8Q
— Sara A. Carter (@SaraCarterDC) September 13, 2021
And they still wonder why people don’t have any faith in corporate media. https://t.co/msmnyx17cJ
— Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) September 14, 2021
To get more information about this article, please visit DAILYCALLER.COM.
Listen to the latest daily DML podcasts below! Then please share. And if you have the DML NEWS APP, please tell people to download it today and help conservatives have a real voice.